Tommy Robinson Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison for Crime of Journalism: Read his Plea for Freedom and Justice Here
          British activist Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison for the crime of journalism today in Woolwich Crown Court and immediately taken to adjoining Belmarsh prison.
Ezra Levant reporting from Tommy’s trial

British activist Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison for the crime of journalism today in Woolwich Crown Court and immediately taken to adjoining Belmarsh prison.

Tommy Robinson (whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) shot the documentary “Silenced” about the way a British boy, Bailey Maclaren, was framed as a “racist attacker” for defending himself against a local school bully, Syrian “refugee” Jamal Hijazi, in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.

The film was first screened in Florida in May 2023 by O’Keefe Media Group after a judge claimed that Robinson had somehow defamed the bully and ordered Robinson to pay £100,000 plus legal costs.

On July 28, 2024, Robinson defied a gag order banning him from showing the film, screening it to a crowd of 100,000 at Trafalgar Square, London, and was subsequently arrested. Robinson has published the film “Silenced”  on X, where it has been seen by 55 million people.

After his arrest and release on July 29, Tommy Robinson left the UK with his family on a scheduled vacation. In his absence, riots broke out in the UK over the horrific stabbing of 13 in Southport near Liverpool by a 17-year-old of Rwandan descent, in which 3 young girls died, aged 6, 7, and 9. The media tried to blame Tommy Robinson for the riots, despite his repeated calls for peace and being on vacation.

Tommy Robinson returned to UK last week to host the “Unite the Kingdom” rally at Parliament Square on Saturday and stand trial, but was arrested on Friday to prevent him from attending his own rally. 100,000 people protested peacefully for free speech and against the Labour government on Saturday.

Today Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison for the crime of “contempt of court”, of which he will have to serve 9 months in solitary confinement in Britain’s maximum security prison HMP Belmarsh, where he was held with fellow politcial prisoner Julian Assange.

The mainstream media falsely claimed that Tommy Robinson had “confessed” or “pleaded guilty”.

“I am guilty of JOURNALISM” is what Tommy actually said (see below).

Ezra Levant of Rebel Media live-tweeted from the court and wrote on rebelnews.com:

Freedom of speech received a huge blow today as Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison for publishing a political documentary called “Silenced”. He is expected to serve nine months.

After a short hearing, Justice Jeremy Johnson immediately delivered a lengthy sentence, appearing to be reading from a prepared script on his computer. The judge said he wanted to apply the maximum sentence of two years to Tommy, but there were certain rules that required the time to be reduced somewhat, such as Tommy’s decision to not contest his guilt.

Tommy was immediately taken away to Belmarsh prison, the most notorious prison in the UK, a high-security facility filled with terrorists and murderers. Tommy will be held in solitary confinement there, as the British prison system is controlled by Islamic prison gangs, and were Tommy in the general population, he would surely be attacked. Nine months in solitary confinement is an extremely unusual sentence, as it is generally considered to be a form of psychological torture, and many jurisdictions no longer permit it for that period of time. Tommy was not convicted of a crime; he is being held for civil contempt, yet he is being held in a prison for murderers. …

Tommy sent a note to me through one of his lawyers after court today, saying he’s fine. I’m heading home to Canada now. But I did promise Tommy I’d visit him regularly, to ensure that he is being treated reasonably well in prison, and I’ll report to you when I do. So I’ll be back soon.

This is the speech Tommy prepared for court today, unfortunately he wasn’t able to give the speech but it is his wish that you all get to read it for yourselves:

Your honour, I believe in freedom of speech and freedom of the press. My duty as a journalist is to uncover the truth and I have worked for years to shine light on challenges in society that no one else is willing to speak about.

Have you watched the documentary, Your Honour?

If you have watched the film ‘Silenced’, Your Honour, you will have seen that I didn’t make accusations and I didn’t make assumptions in the film. I simply repeated what I was told by the Head Teacher of the school and others and what was written in black and white in school documents. I let the witnesses give their testimonies and made it clear that Jamal, in his right to reply, denies all of their accusations against him. I explain Justice Nicklin’s verdict and I explain that I lost the case.

There was nothing else I could have included because Jamal didn’t bring any evidence to court and he didn’t bring anyone to court to speak for him apart from his father, Jihad. No teachers. No social workers. No friends.

It is for this,… REPORTING… for this that I am facing these charges, for this I am facing the prospect of time in a maximum security prison with the risks to my life that presents.

Justice Nicklin’s verdict in this case is extraordinary and while the case caused my divorce and bankruptcy, far more important is the impact his verdict has had on those courageous children who came to court to testify in my defence.

Justice Nicklin effectively discarded their testimonies. He said he didn’t know why they were lying but called them liars nevertheless.

Charlie, a grade A student, didn’t even like me or support me but was courageous enough to come to court to testify. She had a breakdown, she had to be sectioned. Justice Nicklin caused that.

Bailey Maclaren had tried to commit suicide. Thankfully he has started to rebuild his life. He has to overcome the lie that he is racist.

Many others have been affected.

The collateral damage of this scandalous verdict was too great for the public not to know the truth.

Some people still believe the legacy media is there to report what is happening, the truth, rather than push strongly biased accounts driven by ideology or political agendas.

Well, in this case, the press only attended court on the day Jamal and his father gave their accounts. They then left court and didn’t bother to return to hear the testimony of the children who were witnesses for the defence.

The whole balanced picture could not be reported by the legacy media because they weren’t there; they weren’t interested in what the children testifying for the defence had to say.

And then Justice Nicklin tried to prevent the whole picture being given to the public by issuing his injunction, banning the film. Justice Nicklin has banned me from presenting the same evidence that was presented in court.

If it is such a clear-cut case, why is it necessary to hide the facts from the public. If they watched the testimonies of the witnesses, they would surely come to the same conclusion as Justice Nicklin.

What’s the agenda here?

Well the injunction was apparently to protect Jamal’s reputation. Yet it’s not the reputation of Jamal that has been damaged by this legal circus.

I don’t wish any ill for Jamal. I personally think he was a victim of his own predatory lawyers and those who blasted this story around the world for their own purposes.

It’s very telling that Jamal hasn’t asked for me to be prosecuted in this case. Neither have his lawyers. The case has been brought by the Attorney General, by the Government.

In my view there are similarities with the Post OMice case. Powerful interests hiding the truth for their own purposes regardless of the terrible consequences for those innocent children I have mentioned, and others.

I could have shown the film ‘Silenced’ at any point in the preceding three years. I didn’t.

However, I did make the decision to play this film in Trafalgar Square on the 27th July this year. and I am grateful to @elonmusk and X for allowing the film to remain available; for standing for freedom of speech and a free press.

So if you’re asking me whether I plead guilty or not guilty, yes, I’m guilty of showing the film in Trafalgar Square on 27th July. And I am guilty of JOURNALISM.

And, although not for you Your Honour, nor for your court nor for the entire justice system, I do have contempt for Justice Nicklin’s ruling and the actions that attempt to hide the truth from the public.

Justice Nicklin fell out with his own father before the case, arguing about me. He should have recused himself before the case even began.

The world is watching. I stand for the truth, for freedom of speech and freedom of the press and if that puts me on the wrong side of Justice Nicklin’s injunction, then so be it.

If I have to sit in jail for speaking the truth; Well I am just one of many people now that this government is imprisoning for things they say; political prisoners.

This government is releasing violent offenders early to make space for people who tweet things they disagree with.

Peter Lynch is the first to have paid the ultimate price. A sixty-one year-old father, and grandfather, non-violent but imprisoned for his views and his speech. I

f I have to sit in jail for refusing to be silenced for reporting information that was brought to me for journalism…

Then I am prepared for that.

Thank you Your Honour.

The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft interviewed Robinson in the summer of 2022 to discuss the global efforts to silence free speech.

Help support Tommy Robinson here!

The post Tommy Robinson Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison for Crime of Journalism: Read his Plea for Freedom and Justice Here appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/tommy-robinson-sentenced-18-months-prison-crime-journalism/

Comments

https://news.projectmatilda.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!